Legal tech & the legal ops narrative
Is Legal Technology dominating the legal ops narrative in a disproportionate way?
Is Legal Technology dominating the legal ops narrative in a disproportionate way?
In Europe, the European Benchmark Regulation (‘BMR’) has been the catalyst for major transition from the old regime of benchmarks towards new and alternative reference rates set to transform the finance industry.
On the advice of the Legal Ops Manager, an in-house lawyer must decide whether to outsource a high-volume contract renegotiation project to an ALSP. What happens if he does? What if he doesn’t?
Whilst the principle of maintaining legal entities may seem simple, the process can vary significantly across emerging markets. Considerable fines and reputational damage are the likely fall out if entities are found to be non-compliant.
It is incredibly difficult for in-house legal teams to manage both business-as-usual support and these regulatory repaperings which can involve negotiating thousands of documents.
Tech is an essential part of a legal transformation programme. But when it comes to transforming the way legal services are delivered, the maxim ‘People, Process, Technology’ was never truer.
Want to stay ahead of the corporate grim reaper and proactively manage your function? Here are some simple steps to get you back in control.
Our core business involves the review and negotiation of high volumes of contract documents. As such, we wanted to test the benefit of a pre-signature contract review tool versus the good old Microsoft Office tools.
This article was originally published on www.wrike.com and is reproduced with their permission. Kalexius uses Wrike to deliver legal services efficiently, from anywhere. Kalexius isn’t a traditional law firm; they’re an alternative
Answer: everything. In order to begin the transformation journey, there’s a need to gather data about your current situation before comparing alternate delivery models. The assumption is often that you need tech